Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Destanee Aiava vs Fanny Ostlund Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Aiava vs Ostlund analysis and find out who is favored!
Destanee Aiava vs Fanny Ostlund Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Aiava 0 - 0 Ostlund
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Aiava has won 49.74% of points on his second serve, while Ostlund has won 50.55%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Aiava, in recent form, has won 53.7% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ostlund has won 54.98%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.16% and 43.41% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Aiava has saved 56.52% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ostlund has saved 55.6% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Aiava has won 66.67% of matches played (W/L 52/ 26), with Ostlund winning 60.66% (W/L 37/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Aiava has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 46/ 27), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Ostlund has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 31/ 22), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 84/ 69).
- Player level: In the last year, Aiava has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 67.57% of matches (W/L 50/ 24), where as Ostlund has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.66% of matches (W/L 37/ 24). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Aiava has played against opponents with an average rank of 244.27 while Ostlund has played against players with an average rank of 268.25.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Aiava has won 64% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ostlund has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Aiava has converted 48.02% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ostlund has converted 51.18% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Aiava 0 - 0 Ostlund
195
Rank
147
High
24
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
362
Rank
360
High
27
Age
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
61% (220-143)
Career Total W/L
56% (266-209)
58% (15-11)
YTD W/L
63% (10-6)
$127,649
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Destanee Aiava | Fanny Ostlund |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 58% (15/11) | 63% (10/6) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 57% (34/26) | 62% (24/15) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (290/266) | 55% (208/170) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 61% (14/9) | 78% (7/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 43% (3/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.23 | 0.19 |
| Aces Total | 62 | 36 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.25 |
| DFs Total | 59 | 47 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:37:59 | 2:2:52 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 223.69 | 226.75 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (1164/1820) | 70% (857/1217) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (738/1164) | 58% (493/857) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (328/656) | 50% (181/360) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (92/186) | 55% (92/166) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (740/1732) | 49% (585/1183) |
| Slam W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 59% (13/9) | 63% (10/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (15/26) | 60% (9/15) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 57% (4/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (4/8) | 38% (3/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 79% (14/11) | 80% (10/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 21% (14/3) | 20% (10/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (12/4) | 33% (6/2) |
Destanee Aiava Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Irina Maria Bara
Player
Destanee Aiava
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
50 of
82)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
28 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
44 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Antonia Schmidt
Player
Destanee Aiava
71%
(
71 of
100)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
93)
2
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
6
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
32%
(
7 of
22)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
46%
(
46 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Destanee Aiava
Player
Rebecca Munk Mortensen
58%
(
51 of
88)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
96)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
50 of
96)
99
Total Points Won
85
|
5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Stacey Fung
Player
Destanee Aiava
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
55%
(
39 of
71)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
9 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
40 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Destanee Aiava
Player
Haruka Kaji
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
79%
(
38 of
48)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Destanee Aiava
Player
Yuki Naito
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
1
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
5
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Destanee Aiava
Player
Naho Sato
60%
(
62 of
103)
1st Serve %
73%
(
66 of
91)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
91)
104
Total Points Won
90
|
6-7(6) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Destanee Aiava
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Destanee Aiava
Player
Hanna Chang
67%
(
56 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
71 of
108)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
9
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
48 of
71)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
26 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
44 of
108)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lanlana Tararudee
Player
Destanee Aiava
44%
(
39 of
88)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
59%
(
29 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
32 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
79)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Fanny Ostlund Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Sandra Samir
Player
Fanny Ostlund
56%
(
64 of
115)
1st Serve %
73%
(
102 of
139)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
5
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
53 of
102)
55%
(
28 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
36%
(
8 of
22)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
45%
(
52 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
66 of
139)
129
Total Points Won
125
|
6-7(5) 6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fanny Ostlund
Player
Olga Helmi
71%
(
70 of
99)
1st Serve %
70%
(
76 of
109)
4
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
11
47%
(
33 of
70)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
40 of
76)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
8 of
33)
55%
(
11 of
20)
Break Points Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
56%
(
55 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
61 of
109)
105
Total Points Won
103
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maelys Bougrat
Player
Fanny Ostlund
58%
(
57 of
99)
1st Serve %
64%
(
50 of
78)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
45%
(
19 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
48%
(
48 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
90
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fanny Ostlund
Player
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
72%
(
58 of
81)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
88)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
33%
(
27 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
88)
88
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maelys Bougrat
Player
Fanny Ostlund
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
77%
(
79 of
102)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
41 of
79)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
44%
(
35 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
49 of
102)
94
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 6-7(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fanny Ostlund
Player
Farah Heddar
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve %
70%
(
31 of
44)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daria Kudashova
Player
Fanny Ostlund
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve %
64%
(
53 of
83)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
51%
(
41 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
45 of
83)
84
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yeon Woo Ku
Player
Fanny Ostlund
60%
(
58 of
96)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
93)
3
Aces
2
11
Double Faults
5
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
47%
(
45 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
93)
97
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fanny Ostlund
Player
Michika Ozeki
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
22 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cadence Brace
Player
Fanny Ostlund
65%
(
64 of
99)
1st Serve %
69%
(
78 of
113)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
44 of
78)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
88%
(
7 of
8)
44%
(
44 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
51 of
113)
106
Total Points Won
106
|
7-5 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Aiava Vs Ostlund Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
